When Bryan Singer first approached United Artists with the idea of making Valkyrie, he wanted to do it for about $25 million. Then Tom Cruise got interested and the budget exploded. The same thing happened to Lions for Lambs -- to Cruise and Robert Redford, it seemed like a modest little movie; at $35 million plus marketing, it was still too expensive for what it was. The idea of UA being an indie was impossible with the players involved. Now Valkyrie, which several people I know have seen and liked, has bad buzz and will be judged as a costly star vehicle, which is quite different from a $25 million movie with no marquee star. Finally, MGM has decided to give the pic a shot in late December, after it screened well. It had been pushed back to February. This makes sense; if the movie is a smart arty picture with great performances, year-end award season support is probably just what it needs.
- By Anne Thompson
- |
- August 13, 2008 8:59 AM
- |
- 0 Comments
Recent Comments
Yeah, no excuses for such errors, though the usual Cannes sleep deprivation may have had something
No, I was simply trying to describe what I found to be an ugly pallet. I don't have contempt
Great review, but the rhinestone business is in Austria, not Australia.