Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

The Nine Best Quotes from Martin Scorsese's Essay on the Language of Cinema

by Maggie Lange
July 28, 2013 2:46 PM
  • |

Martin Scorsese pens an inspiring, spiritual, and comprehensive essay for The New York Review of Books called "The Persisting Vision: Reading the Language of Cinema." He meditates on the history of cinema, its impact on the humanities, and his own personal connections to different aspects of film. Of course, Scorsese's activism for film preservation is a beating subtext throughout the essay. 

The whole thing is worth a read, but we have selected some key highlights from the original piece. 

  • And I realize now that the warmth of that connection with my family and with the images on the screen gave me something very precious. We were experiencing something fundamental together. We were living through the emotional truths on the screen, often in coded form, which these films from the 1940s and 1950s sometimes expressed in small things: gestures, glances, reactions between the characters, light, shadow. These were things that we normally couldn't discuss or wouldn't discuss or even acknowledge in our lives. And that's actually part of the wonder. Whenever I hear people dismiss movies as "fantasy" and make a hard distinction between film and life, I think to myself that it's just a way of avoiding the power of cinema. Of course it's not lifeā€”it's the invocation of life, it's in an ongoing dialogue with life.

  • The desire to make images move, the need to capture movement, seemed to be with us 30,000 years ago in the cave paintings at Chauvet--in one image a bison appears to have multiple sets of legs, and perhaps that was the artist's way of creating the impression of movement. I think this need to recreate movement is a mystical urge. It's an attempt to capture the mystery of who and what we are, and then to contemplate that mystery.

  • All beginnings are unfathomable--the beginning of human history, the beginning of cinema.
  • |

More: Martin Scorsese, Martin Scorsese


  • Brian | July 29, 2013 11:12 AMReply

    Scorsese sounds the clarion call for preservation, but it's a mission that becomes much harder when "films" are no longer made on film. What form does a movie most often take these days? A hard drive? A memory card? A disc? A tape? Formats that are much more ephemeral than 35mm film ever was. For over 100 years 35mm films could be viewed on a projector. How will we view something on a hard drive in ten years or even five, or two, after the technology has changed? Techies offer a solution that sounds perfectly simple to them: back everything up in whatever new format appears. But who is going to do that? Who takes charge of that? Who keeps track of it? Which version gets backed up? These are big jobs and it's a safe bet that most production companies and studios don't have departments devoted to them. And how many individual filmmakers have the resources to do it?

    And what happens when books stop getting printed and are available only on e-readers? Who's going to preserve the literature of our time? Future archaeologists will find plenty of material from the 20th century they can examine and study. Books and photographs on good photographic paper will last. Even without a projector they will be able to figure out how a reel of film works and reverse engineer a method to view it. But the 21st century will be a complete blank to them since they will be unable to figure out how to decode the formats from our current era.

  • ITTY OUT | July 29, 2013 1:18 AMReply

    Have ANY of the 70's Show wunderkind managed to
    pass the threshold into the next level artistically?

    And where are the second thought, not to say repentance,
    on the 'content' factor.

    How does one feel having basically promoted and celebrated the
    mafia 'vision' without that old Warner Bros. morality of the 30s?

    And beyond that ---just the STALENESS of it all.

  • Orson | July 28, 2013 6:11 PMReply

    I'm surprised by the large number of factual errors in Scorsese's (probably ghost written) ramble, beginning with the circumstances of the "Vertigo" restoration. The old prints were fine; it was the horrible make-over of 1993 that produced the awful magenta color cast that now mars the film, as well as the outrageous, re-foleyed soundtrack, in which the gunshots now sound like explosions in a Michael Bay movie.

  • alfie | July 28, 2013 4:27 PMReply

    it's interesting that Scorsese mentions that Moby Dick was reclaimed decades after it was first published. I saw his My Voyage to Italy recently and I expected to learn something new about the history of Italian cinema but he only repeated what I already knew - that Rossellini, Visconti, de Sica and Fellini were great film makers. He didn't mention anyone or any movie I never heard of and that's what I was hoping for.

  • Ted | July 28, 2013 5:15 PM

    If I remember correctly, he did mention Alessandro Blasetti, who isn't particularly celebrated. Blasetti is interesting because he's the inverse of the Herman Melville. Blasetti was originally celebrated, almost unanimously, by Italian critics (particularly at the Italian film journal Cinema), and won numerous prestigious awards. But now he's mostly just listed in historical footnotes about precursors to Italian neorealism.

    But, also, I think the reason Scorsese might not have mentioned more obscure films because "My Voyage to Italy" was about films that had personally influenced him rather than films he necessarily thought were important.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Why Weinstein Is Re-Releasing Summer ...
  • First Gurus 'O Gold Pre-Festival Top ...
  • Emmy Watch: As TV Enters the Future, ...
  • Emmy Awards: Lena Dunham Wins the Red ...
  • The Radical World of Avant-Garde Master ...
  • Participant Joins DreamWorks' Spielberg ...
  • Trailers From Hell and Joe Dante on ...
  • EXCLUSIVE: Watch the Trailer for Chinese ...
  • TIFF Thriller 'Cut Bank' Picked Up by ...
  • Screen Talk: Telluride Film Festival ...