Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Twilight Saga: Eclipse Early Reviews: Best of Three

by Anne Thompson
June 28, 2010 2:08 AM
  • |
Thompson on Hollywood

Now that two positive trade reviews are in on Twilight: Eclipse, I can weigh in as well.

I agree with EW's assessment that this is the best movie of the three. For one thing, while Catherine Hardwicke did a strong job establishing the franchise, David Slade is by far the best director. And the story of Eclipse, adapted per usual by Melissa Rosenberg, is far more satisfying and well-structured than New Moon, which suffered from the depressed state of Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) and the absence of her vampire heartthrob, Edward Cullen (Rob Pattinson). While Chris Weitz introduced Cullen's werewolf rival Jacob (Taylor Lautner) in New Moon, in this third film, the central love triangle, as both men press their suits with Bella, is front and center.

All three actors are comfortable with their characters, and Slade finds the right balance of action and romance; the story feels organic. Some of the dialogue is earnest and silly--these are "teenagers" after all (it's slightly creepy when Edward reveals how old he really is), but the core strength of the Stephenie Meyer novels is here: the battle between life and love, warm and cold. A scene in a frosty tent with Edward unable to keep Bella warm is brilliantly executed. Judging by the screaming responses to the premiere, the series' female fan base will be more than satisfied by all the kissing and old-fashioned wooing, while the action stunts and wirework are also top-notch.

This movie, which opens June 30, will easily outperform New Moon's $700-million global gross.

Here's Variety:

It goes without saying that the faithful will devour "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse," the third movie in Stephenie Meyer's immensely popular supernatural love-triangle saga, and also the one in which Bella must finally choose between her two beastly suitors. The pleasant surprise this time around is that the result finally feels more like the blockbuster this top-earning franchise deserves. Employing a bigger budget, better effects and an edgier director ("Hard Candy's" David Slade), "Eclipse" focuses on what works -- the stars -- even as the series' parent-friendly abstinence message begins to unravel. Summer release should reap Summit's biggest yield yet.

The Hollywood Reporter agrees (while linking to premiere coverage and red carpet interviews mid-review, which I found annoying):

Bottom Line: The teen vampire series finally hits its stride with an entertaining mix of romance and action fantasy.
It took three films, but "The Twilight Saga" finally nails just the right tone in "Eclipse," a film that neatly balances the teenage operatic passions from Stephenie Meyer's novels with the movies' supernatural trappings.


  • Koto | June 29, 2010 1:38 AMReply

    This whole Twilight frenzy just amazed me.Although there are also some die-hard fans in my counrty,but Twilight(both book and film) had no real buzz in here Japan.Both films,first and second,were flopped in here(each film's boxoffice was like merely 2 or 3mil).

    Btw,I finally saw first film on cable TV recently.It's not bad film,but I was surprised how "small" this movie was.It's a small B-movie.Now I just wonder if third film is a good film only for target audience... Or it's indeed good film even for non-fans?

  • Anthony | June 28, 2010 6:09 AMReply

    I don't understand why you had to wait for other reviewers to post your review. If their review was negative were you going to change yours too? Are you all being paid my Summit to write good reviews of this movie? Did you even watch the movie with your own eyes or are you going with second hand information?

  • dlp | June 28, 2010 5:11 AMReply

    Best of the three.....that's like saying it's better than Ishtar. Any more lockdown, or are we going to leave this movie in the range of F+ to A?

  • Drew | June 28, 2010 4:53 AMReply

    I think it would be hilarious if this turned out to have the best of quality in the series and the worst in terms of box-office performance.

  • mary | June 28, 2010 3:12 AMReply

    It looks like "Eclipse" will become another "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban " (which is generally loved by critics and mainstream audience, but disliked by the fans of the novel.)

    Summit clearly want "Eclipse" to have more appeal the the fans of the novel than critics (otherwise Summit wouldn't fire David Slade's editor)

  • argento2665 | June 28, 2010 2:00 AMReply

    'Best of the three' tells me they've gone from abysmal to simply bad.

  • Sadie | June 28, 2010 1:03 AMReply

    Anthony, there's an embargo on reviews. And usually Variety and Hollywood Reporter are the first ones allowed to report.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Why Weinstein Is Re-Releasing Summer ...
  • First Gurus 'O Gold Pre-Festival Top ...
  • Emmy Watch: As TV Enters the Future, ...
  • Emmy Awards: Lena Dunham Wins the Red ...
  • The Radical World of Avant-Garde Master ...
  • Participant Joins DreamWorks' Spielberg ...
  • TIFF Thriller 'Cut Bank' Picked Up by ...
  • Best of the Week: Return to 'Sin City,' ...
  • 'If I Stay' Leads Dull Friday Box Office, ...
  • Will Emmy-Winner 'Cosmos' Be Back? ...