
But the big box office news is also the 59% plunge of the second weekend of G.I. Joe and the excellent hold, only a 38% drop, of Julie & Julia, starring Hollywood's most reliable movie star these days, the 60-year-old Meryl Streep. I got a kick at seeing her on the Charlie Rose Show (clip below) obviously reveling, after years of misogyny and career ups and downs, in her current hot streak--and stardom. Nora Ephron admitted that she needed the post-Devil Wears Prada Streep to get Julie & Julia made. And Mamma Mia! was a huge global hit too ($602 million worldwide). Here's The Independent on why economists love Streep. And the Academy is over the moon for her too. An Oscar nomination for Streep is secure.
Not so sure how the Academy will handle District 9, which will be on many film critics' ten best lists at year's end. But it's an intense genre thriller. Maybe VFX and some technicals. Neill Blomkamp is an outsider. LOTR Oscar-winner Peter Jackson, who made the film possible, is not.
4 Comments
brian burnett | August 18, 2009 4:40 AM
come on! is anyone paying attention?? my earlier note on the magnificent Meryl had a deliberate error - not spotted?? her last Oscar was for.......Sophie's Choice..........
Kerry Davis | August 17, 2009 5:06 AM
I was hoping GI Joe was going to give more than it gave. The previews were actually better than the movie. I don't know about this one.
Jake Yenor | August 17, 2009 4:36 AM
He did good
- Jake Yenor
brian burnett | August 17, 2009 4:16 AM
Thanks for the posting on the Magnificent Meryl - sure, we know the Academy loves her, but WHY no Oscar for her since Out of Africa, only nominations - come on, guys, wake up in 2010, and do the right thing!
As the New York Times noted in their review of J & J, Streep has 'exceeded all the superlatives'