Why 'The Wizard of Oz' 3-D IMAX Conversion is Worth It

Features
by Aljean Harmetz
September 18, 2013 11:48 AM
3 Comments
  • |

In Kansas, one could see things that were invisible or not noticed before -- a coffeepot, the feathers on a baby chicken. In Oz, too, the folds in the Scarecrow’s burlap bag face and a bird in the apple tree were, rather shockingly, there to be seen. For the first time, the ball in which Glinda, the Good Witch, appears and disappears did not seem like a flawed special effect but something out of a fairy tale. And the black cardboard matte paintings of sets also became real.

Best of all, the studio did not play games with or embellish the movie. No 3-D effects were launched into the audience to show how clever the filmmakers were, and they left the film in its original 1939 aspect ratio of 1.37.1 instead of turning it into a wide screen extravaganza.

I have some reservations.  When you could see the two sets of birds in the trees, that clarity made the witch’s forest much less scary.  All of the characters that rush by Dorothy when the house has been picked up by the tornado seem out of focus.  And, in a few places, the perfection made the artificiality of OZ more artificial.         

What struck me most forcibly was how no vocal or visual enhancement could tarnish Judy Garland’s performance. In fact, surrounded by the utterly clear and intentional artificiality of Oz, she seemed realer than ever.

There is an irony in Warner Bros. taking such tender care of this MGM movie it inherited when it bought Turner Broadcasting Co. from Ted Turner in 1996. In the 1930s “The Wizard of Oz” was the antithesis of the torn-from-the-headlines gangster movies starring John Garfield and James Cagney that filled the Warner schedule. But things always change in Hollywood. Studios thrive. Studios die. Moviemakers lose control to corporate suits. Bigger corporations feed on littler fish.

But “The Wizard of Oz” might just stick around for its 100th anniversary.

Aljean Harmetz is the author of “The Making of the Wizard of Oz.” The updated edition will be published by Chicago Review Press on October 1.

You might also like:

3 Comments

  • Tired of the 3D gimmickry | September 23, 2013 5:35 PMReply

    Did they ted-turnerize the black & white parts of the movie too? I wish 3D would go away like the bad era of colourizing every black & white cell that could be found to squeeze another dollar via "in colour for the first time". Now it's just "in 3D for the first time". 3D is bad enough when applied to new movies. Stop defacing the classics.

  • joes | September 19, 2013 3:02 PMReply

    3D stinks.

    NO need for this. I just wish they would have a 2D option for folks who just want to see a nice print projected on the biggest possible screen. But, money talks, and you only have the 3D option.

    Hooey.

  • David | September 19, 2013 11:18 PM

    You get the 2D version for free. Just close one eye :)

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • LISTEN: On KCRW's The Treatment, Mindy ...
  • Brad Pitt to Star in David Michôd's ...
  • Arthouse Audit: 'Only Lovers Left Alive' ...
  • Fox's Jim Gianopulos to Deliver USC ...
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners Unveiled
  • The Highs and Lows of the Meaningless ...
  • Watch: Highlights from Seth Rogen's ...
  • Box Office Top Ten: 'Captain America' ...
  • Career Watch: As 'Mad Men' Enters Its ...
  • Trailers from Hell on Controversial ...