
In the face of the industry's anxiety-provoking shift to digital, the majors are trying to stay upbeat. Twentieth Century Fox's failure to abandon a seven-year-old production strategy yielded a weak 2010 domestic slate (from Marmaduke to Gulliver's Travels) with a domestic total of $918 million. But the studio was able to claim fourth place thanks to 2009 carryovers Avatar ($408.4 million in 2010) and Alvin and the Chipmunks 2 ($63.7 million in 2010), which boosted their annual take to $1.39 billion (down 4% from 2009). Plus, Fox made up for their U.S. disasters abroad, nearly tying Warner Bros.'s industry record of $2.93 billion. The Burbank studio also claimed the domestic crown for the third year in a row with $1.88 billion (down 12% from 2009).
Anthony D'Alessandro's Winners and Losers box office charts are below: they show return-on-investment by weighing a film's negative cost against domestic "rental" (the share of ticket sales returned by theaters to distributors).
“There are more screens, so a theater can now handle anywhere from two to three 3-D films at one time,” says Paramount distribution exec vp Don Harris, whose studio took second with $1.742 billion and catapulted five 3-D titles past the century mark at the domestic B.O.: Shrek Forever After ($238.4 million), How to Train Your Dragon ($217.6 million), Megamind ($144.2 million), The Last Airbender ($131.6 million) and Jackass 3D ($117.1 million).
It remains to be seen how the 3-D story will play out in 2011, which promises 30 3-D titles. Are film fans dying to see Smurfs 3-D and Final Destination 5?
Even when 3-D musicals (Step Up 3D, domestic B.O. $42.4 million, $125 million foreign) and routine sequels (Resident Evil: Afterlife, $60.1 million domestic, $223 million) didn’t generate waves at home, they outperformed abroad by more than threefold.
Theatrical, which had lost ground to DVDs, the internet and TiVo during the early part of the century, is again the leading film revenue stream against declining DVD sales and fledgling VOD ancillaries. Instead of building DVD libraries, consumers are embarking on unforgettable visual trips: IMAX’s global B.O. doubled to a new record of $546 million over 2009’s $270 million, in large part due to such films as Disney's Alice in Wonderland ($334.2 million) and Tron: Legacy ($133.6 million). “It’s like that feeling you get before leaving on a cool trip," IMAX filmed entertainment chairman-president Greg Foster exclaimed to Screen Daily about 3-D fare. "You have butterflies. Audiences enter the theater with this feeling: This is where I want to be.”

The majors met both hurdles and opportunities during 2010:
Diverse slates vs. failed franchise start-ups:
Warner Bros. charted the top spot in 2010 because it ran its slate like a marathon with 27 releases, more than any major, across a range of genres: guy comedies (Due Date, $99.2 million), chick pics (Valentine’s Day, $110.5 million) and risky franchise start Inception ($292.6 million).
Observed Warner Bros. domestic distrib chief Dan Fellman, "Our company has been able to handle a full release schedule that's north of 20, and we'll continue to do so. Looking at 2011, we have 24-25 movies. It's interesting because the industry trend has been to reduce wide releases, but we've been successful with this [formula]."
Paramount leaned on sequels (Iron Man 2) and DreamWorks animated films (How to Train Your Dragon, with more to come in 2011).
Earning $1.47 billion (+22% vs. ’09), Disney under movie rookie Rich Ross invested in family tentpoles like Alice, but churned out too many costly also-rans (including Jerry Bruckheimer's Prince of Persia and The Sorcerer's Apprentice) resulting in unwieldy marketing/production bills.
Fox placed bad bets on a string of brand-name titles (The A Team, $77.2 million) and star vehicles (Tom Cruise’s Knight and Day cost $117 million vs. domestic B.O. $76.4 million).

Under new studio leadership, Universal generated $885 million and planted a flag in the animation field with Illumination's home run Despicable Me. “We had an OK transitional year," says U distrib chief Nikki Rocco. "We had what we had and did the best we could." The studio weathered several pricey bombs--war movie Green Zone, VFX-crammed Scott Pilgrim vs. the World and the problematic The Wolfman--but minimized their exposure through their co-financing deal with Relativity Media which can fund up to 75% of the studio’s slate. Coming up: Christopher Meledandri's live-action/animated Hop, starring Russell Brand as the Easter Bunny, Vince Vaughn in Ron Howard's The Dilemma and DreamWorks' western Cowboys vs. Aliens, starring Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford.
Indie Summit’s $519.6 million 2010 tally (+8% vs. 2009) was bolstered by The Twilight Saga: Eclipse ($300.5 million), the series’ highest grosser stateside, as well as a series of solid performers such as Roman Polanski's The Ghost Writer and adult ensemble RED.
Lionsgate built its $514.1 million (+28% vs. 2009) on a lean and mean mix of low-budget genre pics including macho adult actioner The Expendables. Cash-generator Tyler Perry's attempt to go upscale, For Colored Girls, was a misfire.
Ill-fated marriages between stars and concepts:
In the wake of such disasters as Jolie/Depp in The Tourist ($54.6 million) and Witherspoon/Wilson in How Do You Know ($25 million), the star system seems to be faltering. The issue is more about pairing stars with the right scripts. Jolie and Depp fans prefer their stars in action fare. Witherspoon followers want their favorite blonde to be flirty, not glum and whiney. One star who is in actual peril stateside is Russell Crowe, who couldn't even pull audiences to a $200-million Ridley Scott action epic (Robin Hood, $105.3 million domestic), much less low-budget thriller The Next Three Days, $21.1 million). With the right epic, Crowe can still work abroad.
Marketing overspending:
The majors continued to fail to curb their ad spending. Paramount spent $280 million on producing and marketing The Last Airbender, which grossed $319 million worldwide. Weren't media congloms’ vertical integration intended to save the media conglom's money, especially when they exploited a property through various ancillary streams? But big-spender Disney, even with its theme parks and the Disney Channel, laid out $100 million-plus to promote Tron: Legacy and Prince of Persia.
Although studios reduced costs by shrinking output (releasing fewer films, 110 in 2010 vs. 121 in 2009) and trimming specialty units, their marketing spends continue to rise with their tentpole budgets. The majors should capitalize more on guerrilla opportunities and sync with their media partners. Sony fueled The Karate Kid’s opening by teaming up with Justin Bieber on the film’s song “Never Say Never." And Lionsgate deployed the brilliant Chatroulette promo for The Last Exorcism.
Banking on fanboys:
Just because a film generates enormous hype at Comic-Con doesn’t mean it’s destined to be a crossover success. Word-of-mouth pushed Lionsgate to acquire Kick-Ass ($48.1 million), Universal to overspend on Scott Pilgrim vs. The World ($31.5 million), and Disney to heighten expectations for Tron: Legacy. Among comic-book adaptations, Paramount’s mighty sequel Iron Man 2 ($312.1 million) is the notable exception, but it was an already-established property.

[Additonal reporting by Sophia Savage.]
3 Comments
Oscar | January 18, 2011 5:33 AM
Production costs vs the box office take and profitability. That is the real story. I'm looking at Easy A, Paranormal Activity 2, The Last Exorcism. It seems in the old days that a studio could generally project what a film would need to make to be profitable and then budget the film with that in mind. Does that happen anymore?
Anthony | January 14, 2011 12:38 AM
Hi Ann,
Profits aren't always made in the wwide market. A studio, on average, will typically generate 40% from a foreign gross vs. the 50/50 split for domestic. Also American indies and comedies need to base their figures on domestic, since they don't always make waves abroad.
Ann | January 12, 2011 4:51 AM
Why do the US media insist on focusing on domestic figures, and determining success or failure solely on the US BO?
The article itself clearly points out that "foreign" BO significantly outperformed "domestic" for many movies, both "successes" and "flops" in the US... so much so that the overall BO resulted on profit for many of them.
Therefore if profits are made in the WW market, surely it is at least just as significant if not more so than the US??