Dude, you CAN'T be serious in ranking Napolean Dynamite in the top ten movies of the year. It is a terrible, terrible piece of cinema. I guess through hipster lenses, one might see it as a slap in the face of mainstream, or something like that.
Dude, you CAN'T be serious in ranking Napolean Dynamite in the top ten movies of the year. It is a terrible, terrible piece of cinema. I guess through hipster lenses, one might see it as a slap in the face of mainstream, or something like that.
Of course, I'm prejudiced, but I find it interesting that you have a Best Cinematography but no Best Editing. It's not an atypical omission, but what are you trying to say here about cinematography?
4 Comments
Lucas | January 27, 2005 7:47 AM
Dude, you CAN'T be serious in ranking Napolean Dynamite in the top ten movies of the year. It is a terrible, terrible piece of cinema. I guess through hipster lenses, one might see it as a slap in the face of mainstream, or something like that.
Lucas | January 27, 2005 7:46 AM
Dude, you CAN'T be serious in ranking Napolean Dynamite in the top ten movies of the year. It is a terrible, terrible piece of cinema. I guess through hipster lenses, one might see it as a slap in the face of mainstream, or something like that.
Norman | January 12, 2005 9:33 AM
Of course, I'm prejudiced, but I find it interesting that you have a Best Cinematography but no Best Editing. It's not an atypical omission, but what are you trying to say here about cinematography?
Len Bias | January 7, 2005 10:33 AM
why you hating on Collateral?
agree w/ most of the rest, though Dogville doesn't even merit lefthanded/halfass praise