Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Cross-Post: Cannes 2012: The Stories Aren’t By Women but They’re About Women

Blogs
by Sasha Stone
May 20, 2012 12:00 PM
4 Comments
  • |

The second film I saw today again turned on its female characters’ storylines. Beyond the Hills (Dupa Dealuri) is the second feature by Cristian Mungiu, who rose to prominence with the much lauded 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days. Like that film, Beyond the Hills feels destined for controversy. For the last two years in Cannes there have been several pro-religion, pro-god movies that are, frankly, a chore to sit through if you aren’t a believer. But Mungiu’s film is anything but.

The story centers on a passionate “friendship” between two teenage girls which comes under strife when one of them turns to the church. She becomes a nun and takes God into her heart as her one and only love. Her friend has a problem with this. She wants things to be the way they once were. Sex between them is alluded to but never directly confirmed. Once Alina (Cristina Flutur) figures out that her friend Voichita (Cosmina Stratan) is never going to leave the church, her behavior becomes more and more violent. Finally, the father of the church decides to perform an exorcism on her to get rid of Satan’s grasp.

Unfortunately, by the time we finally get to the exorcism, the film has gone on at least an hour too long. Had they shaved off some of the beginning we might be more inclined to get wrapped up in this story. However, if you are a non-believer you will find it satisfying that the film has decided to take on faith versus science.

Beyond the Hills was the first film at Cannes to receive boos — and yes, perhaps the audience were expecting something better but as far as films in general go, the selection committee did right by choosing this complicated story for the Cannes competition.

Two extraordinary films that had more to say from the mouths of their female characters than all of the films I saw last year. Here, at this festival, the films are not judged on their potential marketability but what it is they attempt to say. While many of the films do not fall into the conventional Hollywood norm, and may never make a dime, their inclusion in this festival shows that the people making the important decisions here really do consider more important elements of what a film potential might be. When you are here, the possibilities are endless. Cannes is the best place for dreams to thrive.

________________________________________

Printed with permission.  Sasha Stone is the founder of Awards Daily.

Editors Note: Just a reminder, even if you have amazing roles about women that still does not excuse not having films represented by women directors.

Blogs
  • |

More: Cannes Film Festival, Lucy Alibar, Sexism

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

4 Comments

  • BC | May 21, 2012 3:36 PMReply

    I do not understand the point of the first paragraph of this and why are you so worried that a woman would not be able to fix wifi? Seems so contradictory to the whole concept of this site.

  • Bes | May 21, 2012 12:04 PMReply

    Yes the Editors note is needed. Just look at the long history of Hollywood sexism! Hollywood has many problems when it comes to women. One is images of women in film. One is not having women developed stories so authentic women will have a voice. One is calling crap like Sucker Punch, and Girl With the Dragon Tattoo which were written, cast, directed, costumed, edited, filmed etc by men and which women audiences didn't want to watch "women's content". One is not producing content women want to watch. One is only producing biographies about women who work in the sex trade. One problem is improving conditions for women workers in media does not improve entertainment prospects for women audiences. Movies about women characters made by men have a talking dog quality to them and grate on me on a primal level. Sure I've seen a few talking dog movies I liked, but I have grown tired of them and I don't want to see any more. Hollywood has acted like a bunch of sexist idiots regarding women audiences and women characters. So they should not be surprised when people call them idiots or point out their idiotic failings.

  • Tom | May 20, 2012 5:53 PMReply

    I have to agree with Stewart... no need for the "editor's note," especially when Ms. Stone says as much herself.

    I'm not sure what has been hailed as "the Great American Novel" recently, since I don't read as much as I should. However, the greatest (IMO) was written by a woman with a female heroine: To Kill a Mockingbird... major oversight.

    I'm surprised that Ms. Stone didn't have an issue with Hush Puppy being taught by her father (a man). What better of a slogan for a militant organization than "Cunts Unite"?

  • Stewart | May 20, 2012 12:44 PMReply

    Why the "editor's note" at the end? Aren't we able to think and decide for ourselves? Did I really need for you to remind me of that point? What an insult! I strongly resent being treated like a dummy.

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Half of Sarajevo Film Fest Doc Contenders ...
  • Amma Asante Inspires Women Filmmakers ...
  • New York's Women’s Project Theater Hires ...
  • 17% of Venice Film Fest's Main Lineup ...
  • Trailer Watch: Dear White People Tackles ...
  • You're the Worst: Misanthropes In L ...
  • Amanda de Cadenet on Becoming the Newest ...
  • Trailer Watch: Fifty Shades of Grey ...
  • Chicken and Egg Launches New Fund for ...
  • The Big O: Watch Out, Toronto - The ...