I'm a bit obsessed about the Julie Taymor/Spiderman situation. Mostly I'm obsessed because of what this will mean for her career, but also what it will mean for other women's careers. Since her departure from the show several months ago, the narrative has been created by everyone else by her, mostly by necessity, since it didn't make sense for her to speak while she was trying to negotiate terms. But still, she was made out to be this incredibly difficult person who would not listen to reason and change the show so that it would be more commercial. Hardy any blame was given to the musicians The Edge and Bono who had never written a musical before, and during crucial times when the show was in previews were unable to be in the country because of prior commitments to U2.
Anyone who has read any books about musical theatre knows that some of the best musicals have had songs thrown out in previews and others added that have saved and remade shows. That's what happens. But this didn't happen with Spiderman. I would imagine the producers had advance warning of the schedule conflicts of two of the key creative people, but they made the decision to keep moving forward.
She talked about how the producers relied on focus groups for story changes and that bloggers and twitter make it very difficult to be creative since you are under a microscope.
Here are some of her comments:
When you’re trying to create new work, and you’re trying to break new ground and experiment, which seems an incredibly crazy thing to do in a Broadway environment, the immediate answers that audiences give are never going to be good.
It’s just in the nature of things that when you’re doing something very new...audiences don’t know how necessarily to talk about it immediately. Which in my world, and in your world, is a good thing. You want people to absorb, they should be entertained, they should have a great time, but they should also be stimulated enough that when they go home or talk to their kids, they are actually digesting, thinking, talking about it.
She brings up some good points but the overall problem is that this is the world we live in and to think that a large scale Broadway musical with the team that was involved would not have attracted a lot of media is naive. We live in a crazy 24/7 world where creativity and newness is not necessarily embraced. It's ironic that Taymor was trying to do something new with Spiderman, when the whole super hero genre has become so common place in our popular culture. In some ways she tried to make an art house film on a studio budget and those things never seem to work out well.
She is a very different kind of artist but she gets punished for it. Here's a comparison. Look at the reception Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life has gotten. It won best film at Cannes. The press was clamoring for it for over a year before it was done writing story upon story speculating about the film befire anyone had any real details.. The love was been poured on, yet it has only grossed $3.8 million and the budget was $32 million. But Malick is an auteur, and not a failure. I'm not saying that Taymor is perfect. Some of the things she has done have left me quite puzzled. The point is that the press is way harder on Taymor than on other people especially guys and it's important to keep that in perspective.
Taymor Tries to Reclaim a Reputation (NY Times)