Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Toronto Review: Hysteria

Women and Hollywood By Melissa Silverstein | Women and Hollywood September 20, 2011 at 5:00AM

One of the most vivid memories I have of my college learning experience is a class I took on Women in American History. I remember reading Charlotte Perkins Gilman's The Yellow Wallpaper and Kate Chopin's The Awakening and if I didn't have feminist inclinations before I read those books, I sure did the moment my eyes hit the page.
2


One of the most vivid memories I have of my college learning experience is a class I took on Women in American History. I remember reading Charlotte Perkins Gilman's The Yellow Wallpaper and Kate Chopin's The Awakening and if I didn't have feminist inclinations before I read those books, I sure did the moment my eyes hit the page.

Those books (and many other in that class) changed me. It was when I discovered that women were thought to be hysterical because they wanted to have lives outside the home and were told by doctors that they needed to sit quietly and rest and not think too much because that would be too taxing on their poor brains. Their diagnosis of hysteria made some of the women actually lose their minds.

The new movie Hysteria directed by Tanya Wexler takes a comedic twist on this very serious and feminist topic.

Based on a true story, the film gives the story of the invention of the vibrator. It takes place in the 1880's in England when many upper middle class (white) women are being sent to the doctor because they are depressed. The answer the brilliant medical establishment came up with was that these women needed to have an orgasm and everything would be ok for them. Clearly the women needed to have an orgasm, but that was just the beginning of the revolution for women. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays the daughter of the doctor whose practice was created to satisfy rich women whose husbands couldn't. She's not on board with his medicine and calls him out on it because this seems to be a problem only rich women suffer from because women without means are struggling to get through the day and don't have time to be depressed because their sex life sucks.

This was really one of the most heartfelt, feminist and funny films I saw at the festival. Hugh Dancy plays an up and coming young doctor who becomes widely known for his satisfaction skills, and then busts his hand so he can't do it any longer. Rupert Everett plays his friend a rich inventor and together they come up with the first vibrator made from a potential feather duster. Needless to say after the vibrator becomes mobile nobody needed to go to the doctor anymore to have an orgasm.

Maggie Gyllenhaal plays an early social worker who has dedicated her life much to her father's chagrin to working with the poor educating them and doing her best to bridge the class differences. She is, of course, thought to be hysterical herself and is treated like a troublemaker.

While the film takes a very light approach to the topic, one can't help but remember the consequences women suffered when they stepped out of line. When Gyllenhaal's character Charlotte hits a police officer she is hauled off to court and threatened with a hysterectomy or being sent to the insane asylum which is what was done to women who demanded the vote for women and equality between men and women. That is no laughing matter, and there were many women who just didn't toe the line who were made to undergo a devastating procedure just because they said things that society didn't agree with.

I really hope it gets picked up here in the US because it is exactly the type of movie that can talk about important topics and entertain at the same time.

This article is related to: Women Directors, Tanya Wexler, Toronto Film Festival


E-Mail Updates